<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1029 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791827</link>
    <description>At the discharge and charge-framing stage in a PMLA prosecution, the Court held that only the prosecution material, taken at face value, must be examined to see whether it discloses a prima facie case or grave suspicion; a mini trial and assessment of the defence are impermissible. Applying that standard, the Court noted alleged routing, layering, concealment and projection of proceeds of crime through structured financial transactions, supported by documentary material and Section 50 statements. On that basis, the orders rejecting discharge and framing charge were sustained and no interference was warranted in revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 08:18:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1029 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791827</link>
      <description>At the discharge and charge-framing stage in a PMLA prosecution, the Court held that only the prosecution material, taken at face value, must be examined to see whether it discloses a prima facie case or grave suspicion; a mini trial and assessment of the defence are impermissible. Applying that standard, the Court noted alleged routing, layering, concealment and projection of proceeds of crime through structured financial transactions, supported by documentary material and Section 50 statements. On that basis, the orders rejecting discharge and framing charge were sustained and no interference was warranted in revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>