<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 234 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51792</link>
    <description>CEGAT (AT), Bangalore held that where the assessee deposited the duty on manufactured items under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. prior to issuance of the show-cause notice, imposition of penalty under Section 11AC and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was unjustified. The tribunal found no basis for interest liability either and set aside the penalties and interest, disposing of the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 234 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51792</link>
      <description>CEGAT (AT), Bangalore held that where the assessee deposited the duty on manufactured items under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. prior to issuance of the show-cause notice, imposition of penalty under Section 11AC and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was unjustified. The tribunal found no basis for interest liability either and set aside the penalties and interest, disposing of the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>