<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1051 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791849</link>
    <description>Residential status was central to determining jurisdiction and the competent authority for final assessment. The assessee had raised a specific jurisdictional objection before the Dispute Resolution Panel, but that issue was not adjudicated. The record indicated that residential status had to be verified against relevant material, including the passport and period of stay in India, before a valid assessment could be finalised. Because neither the Assessing Officer nor the Dispute Resolution Panel examined this foundational question, the final assessment order was treated as unsustainable in its existing form and the matter was remanded for adjudication of residential status and jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 08:18:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1051 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791849</link>
      <description>Residential status was central to determining jurisdiction and the competent authority for final assessment. The assessee had raised a specific jurisdictional objection before the Dispute Resolution Panel, but that issue was not adjudicated. The record indicated that residential status had to be verified against relevant material, including the passport and period of stay in India, before a valid assessment could be finalised. Because neither the Assessing Officer nor the Dispute Resolution Panel examined this foundational question, the final assessment order was treated as unsustainable in its existing form and the matter was remanded for adjudication of residential status and jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>