<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1062 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791860</link>
    <description>Corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise was treated as not warranting transfer pricing adjustment where no fresh guarantee, cost, or economic sacrifice was shown. Interest disallowance for alleged diversion of borrowed funds failed because the advances were commercially expedient and no direct nexus with borrowings was proved. Weighted deduction for scientific research was not confined to DSIR certification where eligible expenditure was genuinely incurred, while product registration costs were held revenue in nature. Section 14A disallowance could not exceed exempt income or be duplicated in book profit, hedging derivative loss was business loss, and doctor freebies and belated employees&#039; contribution remained disallowable; bonus payment required factual verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 08:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1062 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791860</link>
      <description>Corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise was treated as not warranting transfer pricing adjustment where no fresh guarantee, cost, or economic sacrifice was shown. Interest disallowance for alleged diversion of borrowed funds failed because the advances were commercially expedient and no direct nexus with borrowings was proved. Weighted deduction for scientific research was not confined to DSIR certification where eligible expenditure was genuinely incurred, while product registration costs were held revenue in nature. Section 14A disallowance could not exceed exempt income or be duplicated in book profit, hedging derivative loss was business loss, and doctor freebies and belated employees&#039; contribution remained disallowable; bonus payment required factual verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>