<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1076 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791874</link>
    <description>Earlier review petitions arising from the same judgment had already been dismissed on delay and on merits, and the Court declined to reopen the issue for identically situated petitioners. It held that, after such prior disposal, reconsideration of the same challenge would be improper. The present review petitions were therefore not entertained and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 08:18:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1076 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791874</link>
      <description>Earlier review petitions arising from the same judgment had already been dismissed on delay and on merits, and the Court declined to reopen the issue for identically situated petitioners. It held that, after such prior disposal, reconsideration of the same challenge would be improper. The present review petitions were therefore not entertained and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>