<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1080 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791878</link>
    <description>A demand order under the Assam GST Act, 2017 was found unsustainable because the proper officer had not served a valid prior show cause notice under Section 73(1). A summary in FORM GST DRC-01, even with an attachment showing tax determination, was held not to replace the statutory notice required by Section 73. The court noted that the prescribed sequence under Section 73-notice, any statement under sub-section (3), and then an order under sub-section (9)-had not been followed, and also referred to compliance with the hearing requirement in Section 75(4). The order was therefore set aside and quashed for breach of mandatory procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 08:18:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1080 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791878</link>
      <description>A demand order under the Assam GST Act, 2017 was found unsustainable because the proper officer had not served a valid prior show cause notice under Section 73(1). A summary in FORM GST DRC-01, even with an attachment showing tax determination, was held not to replace the statutory notice required by Section 73. The court noted that the prescribed sequence under Section 73-notice, any statement under sub-section (3), and then an order under sub-section (9)-had not been followed, and also referred to compliance with the hearing requirement in Section 75(4). The order was therefore set aside and quashed for breach of mandatory procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>