<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 210 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51786</link>
    <description>Affixing an assessee&#039;s own label and particulars on helium gas cylinders received already filled by another manufacturer did not amount to manufacture under Note 10 of Chapter 28. The deeming provision for manufacture, covering labelling, re-labelling, repacking from bulk to retail packs, or other treatment to make goods marketable, must be applied strictly. On the facts, the activity was limited to receiving filled cylinders, testing the gas and adding the assessee&#039;s name and particulars; it was not shown to involve repacking or any statutory treatment rendering the product marketable. The duty demand and penalties were therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 210 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51786</link>
      <description>Affixing an assessee&#039;s own label and particulars on helium gas cylinders received already filled by another manufacturer did not amount to manufacture under Note 10 of Chapter 28. The deeming provision for manufacture, covering labelling, re-labelling, repacking from bulk to retail packs, or other treatment to make goods marketable, must be applied strictly. On the facts, the activity was limited to receiving filled cylinders, testing the gas and adding the assessee&#039;s name and particulars; it was not shown to involve repacking or any statutory treatment rendering the product marketable. The duty demand and penalties were therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>