<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 185 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51784</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai resulted in the allowance of Modvat credit for the CNC Panel Cooler but denial for the split Air Conditioner. The CNC Panel Cooler was considered essential for the functioning of goods entitled for credit, while the split Air Conditioner was not. The appeal was partly allowed for the CNC Panel Cooler and dismissed for the split Air Conditioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 185 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51784</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai resulted in the allowance of Modvat credit for the CNC Panel Cooler but denial for the split Air Conditioner. The CNC Panel Cooler was considered essential for the functioning of goods entitled for credit, while the split Air Conditioner was not. The appeal was partly allowed for the CNC Panel Cooler and dismissed for the split Air Conditioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>