<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Regular bail in customs smuggling probe granted where documentary evidence was already with the department and custody was unnecessary.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99899</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a customs smuggling investigation because the case rested chiefly on documentary material already in the custody of the DRI. The court noted that the applicant&#039;s statements had been recorded repeatedly, no incriminating material was found at his residence, and further custodial interrogation was unnecessary for confrontation with the documents. It also took into account the applicant&#039;s long custody, absence of antecedents, and regular income-tax compliance, holding that concerns about absconding or interference could be addressed by bail conditions. Continued detention was therefore found unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 08:18:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 08:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Regular bail in customs smuggling probe granted where documentary evidence was already with the department and custody was unnecessary.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99899</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a customs smuggling investigation because the case rested chiefly on documentary material already in the custody of the DRI. The court noted that the applicant&#039;s statements had been recorded repeatedly, no incriminating material was found at his residence, and further custodial interrogation was unnecessary for confrontation with the documents. It also took into account the applicant&#039;s long custody, absence of antecedents, and regular income-tax compliance, holding that concerns about absconding or interference could be addressed by bail conditions. Continued detention was therefore found unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 08:18:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>