<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1811 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468709</link>
    <description>Non-communication in writing of the grounds of arrest, together with a mechanical remand process and inadequate legal aid safeguards, was treated as non-compliance with mandatory constitutional and procedural protections. The court noted that Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure require effective communication of the basic facts constituting the grounds of arrest to the arrested person, and that the Magistrate must apply judicial mind before authorising remand while ensuring access to counsel and legal aid where necessary. On the record, the petitioner was not shown to have been properly informed in writing, and the remand order was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 20:58:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1811 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468709</link>
      <description>Non-communication in writing of the grounds of arrest, together with a mechanical remand process and inadequate legal aid safeguards, was treated as non-compliance with mandatory constitutional and procedural protections. The court noted that Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure require effective communication of the basic facts constituting the grounds of arrest to the arrested person, and that the Magistrate must apply judicial mind before authorising remand while ensuring access to counsel and legal aid where necessary. On the record, the petitioner was not shown to have been properly informed in writing, and the remand order was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>