https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468710 Failure to communicate the grounds of arrest and to comply with the mandatory arrest-memo safeguards under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Sections 47 and 48 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 rendered the arrest defective. The court held that merely mentioning the offence, the invoked sections, and routine arrest formalities did not satisfy the requirement to disclose the full particulars and supporting material for arrest. That non-compliance was treated as a breach of constitutional and statutory safeguards governing detention, and habeas corpus relief was granted. en-us Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2026 20:58:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468710 Failure to communicate the grounds of arrest and to comply with the mandatory arrest-memo safeguards under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Sections 47 and 48 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 rendered the arrest defective. The court held that merely mentioning the offence, the invoked sections, and routine arrest formalities did not satisfy the requirement to disclose the full particulars and supporting material for arrest. That non-compliance was treated as a breach of constitutional and statutory safeguards governing detention, and habeas corpus relief was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468710