https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468713 Article 22(1) requires written, case-specific communication of the grounds of arrest at the earliest so the arrestee can seek legal recourse. Applying that constitutional safeguard to UAPA arrests, the Court held that the requirement operated from Pankaj Bansal, while Prabir Purkayastha confirmed its pari passu application under UAPA. The distinction between reasons for arrest and grounds of arrest was treated as material, and the investigating agency bore the burden of proving compliance. Because the petitioners were not furnished written grounds at arrest or thereafter, and the remand papers did not cure the defect, the arrest and custody were held unsustainable and release was ordered. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2026 13:45:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468713 Article 22(1) requires written, case-specific communication of the grounds of arrest at the earliest so the arrestee can seek legal recourse. Applying that constitutional safeguard to UAPA arrests, the Court held that the requirement operated from Pankaj Bansal, while Prabir Purkayastha confirmed its pari passu application under UAPA. The distinction between reasons for arrest and grounds of arrest was treated as material, and the investigating agency bore the burden of proving compliance. Because the petitioners were not furnished written grounds at arrest or thereafter, and the remand papers did not cure the defect, the arrest and custody were held unsustainable and release was ordered. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468713