https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468714 A second bail application was rejected because no changed circumstance was shown. Allegations about the investigating officer, seized bitcoin, screenshots and the proffer statement were found not to amount to a fresh ground for the applicant; the concerns mainly related to a co-accused, and the email concerning the proffer statement was already within the applicant's knowledge when the earlier bail request was decided. The Court also noted that delay in trial is relevant only in assessing the gravity of the offence, and observed that the applicant's own conduct had contributed to the delay. On that basis, the application was not fit to be allowed. en-us Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2026 20:58:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468714 A second bail application was rejected because no changed circumstance was shown. Allegations about the investigating officer, seized bitcoin, screenshots and the proffer statement were found not to amount to a fresh ground for the applicant; the concerns mainly related to a co-accused, and the email concerning the proffer statement was already within the applicant's knowledge when the earlier bail request was decided. The Court also noted that delay in trial is relevant only in assessing the gravity of the offence, and observed that the applicant's own conduct had contributed to the delay. On that basis, the application was not fit to be allowed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468714