https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468715 Reliefs seeking compensation and reimbursement were treated as civil claims beyond the Tribunal's adjudicatory scope, so the appeal was not maintainable to that extent. The appellant had already used the SCORES grievance mechanism and, if dissatisfied, was required to pursue the further review remedy within the SEBI framework; that omission supported non-interference. The appeal was also filed after a substantial delay, and no sufficient ground was shown to disturb the impugned disposal on merits or delay. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2026 20:58:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468715 Reliefs seeking compensation and reimbursement were treated as civil claims beyond the Tribunal's adjudicatory scope, so the appeal was not maintainable to that extent. The appellant had already used the SCORES grievance mechanism and, if dissatisfied, was required to pursue the further review remedy within the SEBI framework; that omission supported non-interference. The appeal was also filed after a substantial delay, and no sufficient ground was shown to disturb the impugned disposal on merits or delay. Case-Laws SEBI Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468715