https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468723 The Bombay HC held that the Revenue's proposed questions were already covered by earlier orders in the assessee's own case for prior assessment years. No distinguishing feature was shown to justify departure from those decisions, so the appeal did not raise any substantial question of law. The Revenue's appeal accordingly failed at the threshold and was dismissed. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2026 20:58:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468723 The Bombay HC held that the Revenue's proposed questions were already covered by earlier orders in the assessee's own case for prior assessment years. No distinguishing feature was shown to justify departure from those decisions, so the appeal did not raise any substantial question of law. The Revenue's appeal accordingly failed at the threshold and was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468723