<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 183 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellants, indicating that HDPE bags were eligible inputs for Modvat credit in this case. The decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in determining eligibility for Modvat credit and criticized the reliance on personal observation by quasi-judicial authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 183 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellants, indicating that HDPE bags were eligible inputs for Modvat credit in this case. The decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in determining eligibility for Modvat credit and criticized the reliance on personal observation by quasi-judicial authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>