<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 228 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving disputed FOB value of exported goods, over-invoicing allegations, and confiscation of goods with fines and penalties imposed. The appellants successfully argued against the Revenue&#039;s evidence, emphasizing the quality and intended use of the goods. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient and criticized the valuation method based on raw material cost. Emphasizing the arm&#039;s length transaction and previous Tribunal order acceptance, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, providing relief to the appellants due to lack of justification for lowering the FOB value or imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 228 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order in a case involving disputed FOB value of exported goods, over-invoicing allegations, and confiscation of goods with fines and penalties imposed. The appellants successfully argued against the Revenue&#039;s evidence, emphasizing the quality and intended use of the goods. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient and criticized the valuation method based on raw material cost. Emphasizing the arm&#039;s length transaction and previous Tribunal order acceptance, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, providing relief to the appellants due to lack of justification for lowering the FOB value or imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>