<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1443 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468703</link>
    <description>Receipts from management services were held not taxable as fees for technical services because the services were rendered under a separate management agreement and were distinct from the licence arrangement covering royalty and technical assistance. The existence of related agreements for patents, trademarks, copyrights and know-how did not convert management support into treaty-based technical services. On the India-Singapore treaty issue, the services in the relevant year were materially similar to earlier years, and the make available requirement under Article 12(4)(b) was not satisfied. The addition was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1443 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468703</link>
      <description>Receipts from management services were held not taxable as fees for technical services because the services were rendered under a separate management agreement and were distinct from the licence arrangement covering royalty and technical assistance. The existence of related agreements for patents, trademarks, copyrights and know-how did not convert management support into treaty-based technical services. On the India-Singapore treaty issue, the services in the relevant year were materially similar to earlier years, and the make available requirement under Article 12(4)(b) was not satisfied. The addition was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>