<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 226 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51772</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G(2A) was available on the original invoice where the duplicate copy was lost in transit, provided the Assistant Commissioner was satisfied about the loss and about the duty-paid nature, receipt, and use of the inputs in manufacture. The record showed that these substantive conditions were met, so the objection that prior permission was required before adjudication was rejected. Minor procedural or technical irregularities in the invoice copy used did not defeat otherwise admissible credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:26:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 226 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51772</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G(2A) was available on the original invoice where the duplicate copy was lost in transit, provided the Assistant Commissioner was satisfied about the loss and about the duty-paid nature, receipt, and use of the inputs in manufacture. The record showed that these substantive conditions were met, so the objection that prior permission was required before adjudication was rejected. Minor procedural or technical irregularities in the invoice copy used did not defeat otherwise admissible credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>