<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1001 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791799</link>
    <description>Under the India-Canada DTAA, remote access to customers&#039; theatre systems for maintenance and troubleshooting did not create a fixed place permanent establishment because the customers&#039; premises were not at the assessee&#039;s disposal and the required nexus with a place of business was absent. The Tribunal also found no service or supervisory permanent establishment, as services were rendered for only 67 days, below the treaty&#039;s 90-day threshold, and there was no physical presence of personnel in India. It rejected an attempt to infer employment from a LinkedIn profile and declined to recognise a virtual permanent establishment without express treaty language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1001 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791799</link>
      <description>Under the India-Canada DTAA, remote access to customers&#039; theatre systems for maintenance and troubleshooting did not create a fixed place permanent establishment because the customers&#039; premises were not at the assessee&#039;s disposal and the required nexus with a place of business was absent. The Tribunal also found no service or supervisory permanent establishment, as services were rendered for only 67 days, below the treaty&#039;s 90-day threshold, and there was no physical presence of personnel in India. It rejected an attempt to infer employment from a LinkedIn profile and declined to recognise a virtual permanent establishment without express treaty language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>