<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Permanent establishment under the India-Canada DTAA was rejected where remote services and short site visits failed the treaty tests.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99872</link>
    <description>Remote troubleshooting and maintenance did not create a fixed place PE, because the customers&#039; systems were not at the assessee&#039;s disposal and the recognised tests of permanence and carrying on business through an identified place in India were not met. Site visits of 67 days also fell below the India-Canada DTAA threshold, and the treaty did not recognise a virtual service PE based only on remote service delivery. The tribunal further declined to treat a LinkedIn profile as determinative of employment status. No fixed place PE, service PE or supervisory PE existed, so the appeal was allowed and profit attribution was not examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:40:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Permanent establishment under the India-Canada DTAA was rejected where remote services and short site visits failed the treaty tests.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99872</link>
      <description>Remote troubleshooting and maintenance did not create a fixed place PE, because the customers&#039; systems were not at the assessee&#039;s disposal and the recognised tests of permanence and carrying on business through an identified place in India were not met. Site visits of 67 days also fell below the India-Canada DTAA threshold, and the treaty did not recognise a virtual service PE based only on remote service delivery. The tribunal further declined to treat a LinkedIn profile as determinative of employment status. No fixed place PE, service PE or supervisory PE existed, so the appeal was allowed and profit attribution was not examined.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:40:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>