https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51767 The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's order confirming duty demands, penalties, and interest lacked conformity with natural justice and law due to procedural irregularities. The order, not signed by the Commissioner, did not consider written replies and arguments during the personal hearing. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of addressing arguments raised by the appellants and consulting the relevant authority regarding permissions granted for DTA sales. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order, remanding the case for reevaluation with consideration of the Development Commissioner's views on permissions granted. The appeal was allowed as remand, with related applications disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:11:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51767 The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's order confirming duty demands, penalties, and interest lacked conformity with natural justice and law due to procedural irregularities. The order, not signed by the Commissioner, did not consider written replies and arguments during the personal hearing. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of addressing arguments raised by the appellants and consulting the relevant authority regarding permissions granted for DTA sales. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order, remanding the case for reevaluation with consideration of the Development Commissioner's views on permissions granted. The appeal was allowed as remand, with related applications disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51767