https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51767 An adjudication order was found unsustainable where it failed to consider the written reply and oral submissions made at hearing, and was not signed by the adjudicating authority. The authority also had to consider the permissions granted by the Development Commissioner and the appellant's objections before confirming the demand. Because these procedural defects and the breach of natural justice vitiated the decision, the order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after due hearing. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:11:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51767 An adjudication order was found unsustainable where it failed to consider the written reply and oral submissions made at hearing, and was not signed by the adjudicating authority. The authority also had to consider the permissions granted by the Development Commissioner and the appellant's objections before confirming the demand. Because these procedural defects and the breach of natural justice vitiated the decision, the order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after due hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51767