<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1868 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468692</link>
    <description>Gross profit additions based solely on a lower profit ratio were found unsustainable where the books of account were not rejected under section 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The record showed higher power and manganese ore costs, but also improved profit per metric tonne, and no specific defect, discrepancy, or comparable case was identified to justify estimation of income. Non-production of certain bank-related statements, by itself, did not warrant an estimated addition once the relevant records had been examined in remand proceedings without adverse findings. The deletion of the addition was therefore upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 09:19:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1868 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468692</link>
      <description>Gross profit additions based solely on a lower profit ratio were found unsustainable where the books of account were not rejected under section 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The record showed higher power and manganese ore costs, but also improved profit per metric tonne, and no specific defect, discrepancy, or comparable case was identified to justify estimation of income. Non-production of certain bank-related statements, by itself, did not warrant an estimated addition once the relevant records had been examined in remand proceedings without adverse findings. The deletion of the addition was therefore upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>