<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 292 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51763</link>
    <description>Under the Central Excise duty scheme for annual capacity-based assessment, an assessee may seek redetermination of duty liability on proof that actual production is lower than the capacity fixed under Section 3A(2). If such evidence is produced, the Commissioner must redetermine duty with reference to actual production under Section 3A(4) and adjust excess duty under Section 3A(5). Payment of duty under Rule 96ZO(1) does not by itself exclude this statutory relief; the limitation recognised in the authorities relied on by Revenue was confined to Rule 96ZO(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 292 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51763</link>
      <description>Under the Central Excise duty scheme for annual capacity-based assessment, an assessee may seek redetermination of duty liability on proof that actual production is lower than the capacity fixed under Section 3A(2). If such evidence is produced, the Commissioner must redetermine duty with reference to actual production under Section 3A(4) and adjust excess duty under Section 3A(5). Payment of duty under Rule 96ZO(1) does not by itself exclude this statutory relief; the limitation recognised in the authorities relied on by Revenue was confined to Rule 96ZO(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>