<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 220 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51761</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Court No. I, New Delhi ruled in favor of the respondent in a dispute over entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 253/82 for denim fabric processors. The Tribunal found that the processes carried out by the respondent, including shrink proofing and coating, aligned with the exemption criteria and did not disqualify them from the exemption. Legal precedents were cited to support the decision, emphasizing the nature of textile processing and the absence of lasting changes to fabric characteristics. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of processes, compliance with notification conditions, and the temporary nature of the processes involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 220 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51761</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Court No. I, New Delhi ruled in favor of the respondent in a dispute over entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 253/82 for denim fabric processors. The Tribunal found that the processes carried out by the respondent, including shrink proofing and coating, aligned with the exemption criteria and did not disqualify them from the exemption. Legal precedents were cited to support the decision, emphasizing the nature of textile processing and the absence of lasting changes to fabric characteristics. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of processes, compliance with notification conditions, and the temporary nature of the processes involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>