https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791725 A recall application seeking reopening of an order rejecting condonation of delay was not maintainable because no credible sufficient cause was shown. The record established service of notice on the appellant and counsel, and the claim that listing notice had not been served was contradicted by the track consignment report. In the absence of material showing that the official record was or that any valid reason existed to revisit the earlier order, the application was rejected, leaving the refusal to condone delay undisturbed. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791725 A recall application seeking reopening of an order rejecting condonation of delay was not maintainable because no credible sufficient cause was shown. The record established service of notice on the appellant and counsel, and the claim that listing notice had not been served was contradicted by the track consignment report. In the absence of material showing that the official record was or that any valid reason existed to revisit the earlier order, the application was rejected, leaving the refusal to condone delay undisturbed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791725