<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 929 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791727</link>
    <description>Cashback or reward incentives received on use of a commercial credit card were treated as outside the service tax net because there was no agreement requiring the cardholder to promote the banks&#039; business or perform any other service in return for the incentive. Mere use of the card to make payments did not amount to a taxable declared service, and the alleged promotional activity was not supported by the notice or the record. The incentive was a bank-funded cashback scheme intended to stimulate card usage and expand the bank&#039;s own business, so the essential nexus between activity and consideration was absent. The Board&#039;s circular likewise recognised that taxability depends on a specific act, forbearance, or tolerance for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 929 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791727</link>
      <description>Cashback or reward incentives received on use of a commercial credit card were treated as outside the service tax net because there was no agreement requiring the cardholder to promote the banks&#039; business or perform any other service in return for the incentive. Mere use of the card to make payments did not amount to a taxable declared service, and the alleged promotional activity was not supported by the notice or the record. The incentive was a bank-funded cashback scheme intended to stimulate card usage and expand the bank&#039;s own business, so the essential nexus between activity and consideration was absent. The Board&#039;s circular likewise recognised that taxability depends on a specific act, forbearance, or tolerance for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>