<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791739</link>
    <description>A foreign reinsurer&#039;s receipts from reinsurance and retrocession were analysed on the basis that the core risk assumption and capital deployment functions were carried on outside India, while Indian entities acted as independent service providers and their premises were not at the assessee&#039;s disposal. On those facts, no fixed place, service or dependent agent permanent establishment arose, and the domestic law test of business connection was also not met, so the receipts were not taxable in India as business profits. The support-service payments were treated as managerial and coordination functions, but they did not make available technical knowledge, skill, experience or know-how to the Indian recipients, so they were not Fees for Technical Services and were not taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791739</link>
      <description>A foreign reinsurer&#039;s receipts from reinsurance and retrocession were analysed on the basis that the core risk assumption and capital deployment functions were carried on outside India, while Indian entities acted as independent service providers and their premises were not at the assessee&#039;s disposal. On those facts, no fixed place, service or dependent agent permanent establishment arose, and the domestic law test of business connection was also not met, so the receipts were not taxable in India as business profits. The support-service payments were treated as managerial and coordination functions, but they did not make available technical knowledge, skill, experience or know-how to the Indian recipients, so they were not Fees for Technical Services and were not taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>