<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 948 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791746</link>
    <description>Under TNMM, comparability depends primarily on FAR analysis, with the search matrix serving only as a tool; functionally dissimilar companies, entities with high R&amp;D intensity, filter failures, or distorted turnover were excluded, while similar companies were retained. Provision for doubtful debts and routine rates and taxes were treated as operating items, and working capital differences in receivables, payables and inventory were held to warrant adjustment, subject to recomputation. Notional interest on delayed AE receivables was not sustained absent borrowing cost or actual benefit. Royalty and intra-group service charges could not be benchmarked at nil without proper comparables, and the section 40(a)(ia) disallowance failed where the sums were not shown to be TDS-applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 948 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791746</link>
      <description>Under TNMM, comparability depends primarily on FAR analysis, with the search matrix serving only as a tool; functionally dissimilar companies, entities with high R&amp;D intensity, filter failures, or distorted turnover were excluded, while similar companies were retained. Provision for doubtful debts and routine rates and taxes were treated as operating items, and working capital differences in receivables, payables and inventory were held to warrant adjustment, subject to recomputation. Notional interest on delayed AE receivables was not sustained absent borrowing cost or actual benefit. Royalty and intra-group service charges could not be benchmarked at nil without proper comparables, and the section 40(a)(ia) disallowance failed where the sums were not shown to be TDS-applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>