<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 953 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791751</link>
    <description>A notice issued under section 148 was held time-barred because it was served after the six-year limitation period under section 149(1)(b) had expired. As the notice was issued on 28.04.2022 for assessment year 2015-16, it should have been issued on or before 31.03.2022. The invalid notice could not sustain the reassessment proceedings, so the reassessment order was also invalid and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 953 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791751</link>
      <description>A notice issued under section 148 was held time-barred because it was served after the six-year limitation period under section 149(1)(b) had expired. As the notice was issued on 28.04.2022 for assessment year 2015-16, it should have been issued on or before 31.03.2022. The invalid notice could not sustain the reassessment proceedings, so the reassessment order was also invalid and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>