https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791759 AAC bricks/blocks were examined for tariff classification by comparing their composition, autoclaving process, and the competing tariff entries. The goods were found not to meet the firing requirement for ceramic products under Chapter 69, and the chemical analysis relied on did not establish that they were ceramic bricks. The tariff description and explanatory notes for Heading 6810 were held to align with the product, so classification under Heading 6904 was rejected and the goods were held classifiable under Heading 6810. en-us Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791759 AAC bricks/blocks were examined for tariff classification by comparing their composition, autoclaving process, and the competing tariff entries. The goods were found not to meet the firing requirement for ceramic products under Chapter 69, and the chemical analysis relied on did not establish that they were ceramic bricks. The tariff description and explanatory notes for Heading 6810 were held to align with the product, so classification under Heading 6904 was rejected and the goods were held classifiable under Heading 6810. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791759