<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1411 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468649</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed for default because the appellant did not appear on multiple dates and showed no interest in pursuing the matter. The record and order sheets indicated repeated non-appearance, and no adjournment request was received. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the appeal as not being actively prosecuted and dismissed it accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 20:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1411 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468649</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed for default because the appellant did not appear on multiple dates and showed no interest in pursuing the matter. The record and order sheets indicated repeated non-appearance, and no adjournment request was received. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the appeal as not being actively prosecuted and dismissed it accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>