<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 215 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51749</link>
    <description>Flywheels received for further processing were treated as Modvat inputs, but where the processing did not amount to manufacture, no duty liability arose on the processed goods and the credit remained a dead entry. On that basis, reversal of the credit or adjustment against duty was held unnecessary because the credit could not be put to practical use. The demand was set aside, while the direction for future receipts under Rule 173H was confined to regulating subsequent transactions and preventing further disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 215 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51749</link>
      <description>Flywheels received for further processing were treated as Modvat inputs, but where the processing did not amount to manufacture, no duty liability arose on the processed goods and the credit remained a dead entry. On that basis, reversal of the credit or adjustment against duty was held unnecessary because the credit could not be put to practical use. The demand was set aside, while the direction for future receipts under Rule 173H was confined to regulating subsequent transactions and preventing further disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>