https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468676 Writ petitions challenging GST assessment orders were not entertained because an effective statutory appeal was available and the dispute involved questions of fact. The Court found no demonstrated procedural irregularity or perversity in the orders passed after consideration of the replies to the show cause notices, and held that the appellate remedy was the appropriate course. The petitioners were allowed to pursue appeals on depositing 25% of the disputed tax as pre-deposit within the stipulated time, and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeals on merits without reference to limitation. en-us Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2026 20:34:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468676 Writ petitions challenging GST assessment orders were not entertained because an effective statutory appeal was available and the dispute involved questions of fact. The Court found no demonstrated procedural irregularity or perversity in the orders passed after consideration of the replies to the show cause notices, and held that the appellate remedy was the appropriate course. The petitioners were allowed to pursue appeals on depositing 25% of the disputed tax as pre-deposit within the stipulated time, and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeals on merits without reference to limitation. Case-Laws GST Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468676