<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 214 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51748</link>
    <description>Exemption under the excise scheme remained unavailable where the assessee admittedly failed to comply with the prescribed Chapter X procedure and lacked the required L6 licence for the Pune unit. The Tribunal held that exemption conditions and procedural safeguards form part of the statutory scheme and must be satisfied in full; they cannot be treated as optional or selectively ignored while still claiming consequential refund. Because the mandatory procedure was not followed, the exemption claim failed and refund was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:12:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 214 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51748</link>
      <description>Exemption under the excise scheme remained unavailable where the assessee admittedly failed to comply with the prescribed Chapter X procedure and lacked the required L6 licence for the Pune unit. The Tribunal held that exemption conditions and procedural safeguards form part of the statutory scheme and must be satisfied in full; they cannot be treated as optional or selectively ignored while still claiming consequential refund. Because the mandatory procedure was not followed, the exemption claim failed and refund was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>