<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 167 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside penalties on dealers and directing the Commissioner to determine credit eligibility based on established correlation between coils and sheets. Emphasizing proper correlation through weight and reasonable correspondence in time, the Tribunal highlighted the challenge of physical correlation due to the nature of goods. The liability to penalty for manufacturers hinged on the extent of credit denied post correlation establishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:10:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 167 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside penalties on dealers and directing the Commissioner to determine credit eligibility based on established correlation between coils and sheets. Emphasizing proper correlation through weight and reasonable correspondence in time, the Tribunal highlighted the challenge of physical correlation due to the nature of goods. The liability to penalty for manufacturers hinged on the extent of credit denied post correlation establishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>