<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1698 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468644</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the appellant gave only vague explanations and failed to show sufficient cause for the entire period of delay. The stated reasons did not satisfactorily account for the lateness, and even on the appellant&#039;s own version the appeal could have been filed within time after knowledge of the order. As no adequate basis was shown to exclude the delay, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:49:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1698 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468644</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the appellant gave only vague explanations and failed to show sufficient cause for the entire period of delay. The stated reasons did not satisfactorily account for the lateness, and even on the appellant&#039;s own version the appeal could have been filed within time after knowledge of the order. As no adequate basis was shown to exclude the delay, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>