<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 164 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51743</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where duty-paid inputs were admittedly received in the factory and used in manufacture, even though they had been temporarily stored in godowns outside the factory for business reasons. Recognised departmental circulars and trade notices accepted such outside storage, so temporary storage alone did not disentitle the assessee from credit. On those admitted facts, penalty was also unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 164 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51743</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where duty-paid inputs were admittedly received in the factory and used in manufacture, even though they had been temporarily stored in godowns outside the factory for business reasons. Recognised departmental circulars and trade notices accepted such outside storage, so temporary storage alone did not disentitle the assessee from credit. On those admitted facts, penalty was also unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>