<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Concerned authorities and Counsels need to be more diligent sincere and honest to avoid wastage of valuable time of honourable Courts and avoid wastage of highly valuable human resources of nation</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16426</link>
    <description>Government litigation in tax matters requires careful scrutiny of the impugned order, the correct appealable order, the tax effect, applicable litigation policy, and any exception under the governing CBDT circulars before an appeal is filed or pursued. Appeals should not be instituted mechanically or with inadequate verification, particularly where delay applications, multiple orders of the same date, or prior case history require closer examination by departmental officers and counsel. The article uses reported instances to illustrate avoidable departmental appeals arising from filing against the wrong order or failing to identify the relevant exceptional clause under the CBDT litigation circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:16:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Concerned authorities and Counsels need to be more diligent sincere and honest to avoid wastage of valuable time of honourable Courts and avoid wastage of highly valuable human resources of nation</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16426</link>
      <description>Government litigation in tax matters requires careful scrutiny of the impugned order, the correct appealable order, the tax effect, applicable litigation policy, and any exception under the governing CBDT circulars before an appeal is filed or pursued. Appeals should not be instituted mechanically or with inadequate verification, particularly where delay applications, multiple orders of the same date, or prior case history require closer examination by departmental officers and counsel. The article uses reported instances to illustrate avoidable departmental appeals arising from filing against the wrong order or failing to identify the relevant exceptional clause under the CBDT litigation circular.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:16:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>