<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 239 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, emphasizing that discrepancies in the address on invoices should not invalidate Modvat credit eligibility when goods are utilized in the factory. Invoices totaling Rs. 7.49 lakhs were deemed valid despite not being marked as duplicate, as the requirement came into effect later. The Tribunal held that a trade notice lacking legal authority cannot be used to deny credit based on missing details like mode of transport and time. However, credit based on a customer copy of an invoice was denied due to lack of relevant legal grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:56:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 239 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, emphasizing that discrepancies in the address on invoices should not invalidate Modvat credit eligibility when goods are utilized in the factory. Invoices totaling Rs. 7.49 lakhs were deemed valid despite not being marked as duplicate, as the requirement came into effect later. The Tribunal held that a trade notice lacking legal authority cannot be used to deny credit based on missing details like mode of transport and time. However, credit based on a customer copy of an invoice was denied due to lack of relevant legal grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>