<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 871 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791669</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a service-tax adjudication order centred on whether works executed for the Government qualified for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST and whether the order had meaningfully addressed that claim. The High Court declined direct interference in writ jurisdiction, noting the petitioner&#039;s delay in following up after the show cause reply and failure to update the department with the changed address. It held that the exemption issue should be examined by the statutory appellate forum and permitted the petitioner to pursue that remedy by condoning delay on payment of costs, with the appeal to be decided in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 871 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791669</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a service-tax adjudication order centred on whether works executed for the Government qualified for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST and whether the order had meaningfully addressed that claim. The High Court declined direct interference in writ jurisdiction, noting the petitioner&#039;s delay in following up after the show cause reply and failure to update the department with the changed address. It held that the exemption issue should be examined by the statutory appellate forum and permitted the petitioner to pursue that remedy by condoning delay on payment of costs, with the appeal to be decided in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>