<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 890 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791688</link>
    <description>In search assessments under section 153A, an addition for alleged unaccounted commission cannot be sustained where the seized sale deeds do not show receipt of commission, no enquiry is made from the transaction parties, and no material establishes that the assessee acted as a broker. A protective addition for alleged cash expenditure also cannot survive when the seized documents are owned up by another person, supported by an affidavit, and the same material has already been considered in settlement proceedings with no further addition found necessary. The article states that incriminating material is required to support such additions and that conjecture is insufficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:15:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 890 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791688</link>
      <description>In search assessments under section 153A, an addition for alleged unaccounted commission cannot be sustained where the seized sale deeds do not show receipt of commission, no enquiry is made from the transaction parties, and no material establishes that the assessee acted as a broker. A protective addition for alleged cash expenditure also cannot survive when the seized documents are owned up by another person, supported by an affidavit, and the same material has already been considered in settlement proceedings with no further addition found necessary. The article states that incriminating material is required to support such additions and that conjecture is insufficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>