<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 910 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791708</link>
    <description>Section 16(5) of the CGST Act, introduced with a non-obstante clause, was treated as retrospectively extending the time limit for claiming Input Tax Credit for the covered periods, overriding the earlier restriction in Section 16(4). As the relevant return had been filed within the extended time, the adjudication denying credit could not be sustained. The High Court set aside the order denying Input Tax Credit and remitted the matter to the stage of reply to the show cause notice, granting relief to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:15:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 910 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791708</link>
      <description>Section 16(5) of the CGST Act, introduced with a non-obstante clause, was treated as retrospectively extending the time limit for claiming Input Tax Credit for the covered periods, overriding the earlier restriction in Section 16(4). As the relevant return had been filed within the extended time, the adjudication denying credit could not be sustained. The High Court set aside the order denying Input Tax Credit and remitted the matter to the stage of reply to the show cause notice, granting relief to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>