<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 911 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791709</link>
    <description>A statutory appeal dismissed solely for delay may be interfered with in writ jurisdiction where the delay is explained and comparable matters have been restored for merits consideration. The petitioner stated that the appeal was filed after knowledge of the impugned order, and the respondent did not dispute that position. On that basis, the delay was condoned, the dismissal for delay was set aside, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:15:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 911 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791709</link>
      <description>A statutory appeal dismissed solely for delay may be interfered with in writ jurisdiction where the delay is explained and comparable matters have been restored for merits consideration. The petitioner stated that the appeal was filed after knowledge of the impugned order, and the respondent did not dispute that position. On that basis, the delay was condoned, the dismissal for delay was set aside, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>