<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 156 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, finding the denial of Modvat credit on &#039;Die Casting Machines&#039; erroneous. It was determined that the machines were used for both exempted and dutiable goods, making them eligible for credit under Rule 57R. The delay in filing the declaration under Rule 57T was condoned by the Assistant Commissioner within the permissible time limit, supported by the Goods Receipt Note. The Tribunal held the impugned order unsustainable for not considering the Goods Receipt Note and disregarding precedent on credit denial for declaration failure, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 156 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, finding the denial of Modvat credit on &#039;Die Casting Machines&#039; erroneous. It was determined that the machines were used for both exempted and dutiable goods, making them eligible for credit under Rule 57R. The delay in filing the declaration under Rule 57T was condoned by the Assistant Commissioner within the permissible time limit, supported by the Goods Receipt Note. The Tribunal held the impugned order unsustainable for not considering the Goods Receipt Note and disregarding precedent on credit denial for declaration failure, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>