<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 915 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791713</link>
    <description>Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under Section 107 of the CGST Act, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 may be declined and the petitioner relegated to the appellate forum. Here, the challenge to the ex parte assessment order was not examined on merits; instead, the court permitted the petitioner to pursue the appeal and granted limited interim protection against coercive action to enable filing of the appeal within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 915 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791713</link>
      <description>Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available under Section 107 of the CGST Act, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 may be declined and the petitioner relegated to the appellate forum. Here, the challenge to the ex parte assessment order was not examined on merits; instead, the court permitted the petitioner to pursue the appeal and granted limited interim protection against coercive action to enable filing of the appeal within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>