<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 917 - MAHDYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791715</link>
    <description>Bail was declined in an alleged duty-evasion case under a capacity-based levy regime because prima facie material supported clandestine manufacture and concealment of packing machines. The Court held that the applicant&#039;s claim that one machine was non-functional raised disputed factual questions that could not be resolved at the bail stage. It relied on search material, statements, seizure of machines and goods, and the alleged concealment to treat the matter as a serious economic offence involving public revenue. Continuing investigation, alleged non-cooperation, and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses were treated as further grounds against release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 917 - MAHDYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791715</link>
      <description>Bail was declined in an alleged duty-evasion case under a capacity-based levy regime because prima facie material supported clandestine manufacture and concealment of packing machines. The Court held that the applicant&#039;s claim that one machine was non-functional raised disputed factual questions that could not be resolved at the bail stage. It relied on search material, statements, seizure of machines and goods, and the alleged concealment to treat the matter as a serious economic offence involving public revenue. Continuing investigation, alleged non-cooperation, and the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses were treated as further grounds against release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>