<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1829 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468616</link>
    <description>Departmental appeals may be rejected as not maintainable where the tax effect falls below the prescribed monetary threshold; here, the appeal was dismissed in limine on that basis. On the merits of the addition for alleged excess cash realisation, the Tribunal held that a 20% extra gross profit rate was excessive on the facts and reduced it to 10%, granting partial relief to the assessee while sustaining the balance addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1829 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468616</link>
      <description>Departmental appeals may be rejected as not maintainable where the tax effect falls below the prescribed monetary threshold; here, the appeal was dismissed in limine on that basis. On the merits of the addition for alleged excess cash realisation, the Tribunal held that a 20% extra gross profit rate was excessive on the facts and reduced it to 10%, granting partial relief to the assessee while sustaining the balance addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>