<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1830 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468617</link>
    <description>Alleged on-money additions cannot be extrapolated across other flats or shops merely from loose papers, draft booking forms or a third-party statement unless there is corroborative enquiry linking the cash component to identifiable transactions; on that basis, the tribunal found the wider additions unsustainable for assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19, while accepting only the specific differential amount supported by seized booking forms for assessment year 2019-20. Separately, unexplained expenditure under section 69C was sustained where seized material showed project-related payments and the assessee failed to produce a credible explanation or supporting evidence to reconcile the entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1830 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468617</link>
      <description>Alleged on-money additions cannot be extrapolated across other flats or shops merely from loose papers, draft booking forms or a third-party statement unless there is corroborative enquiry linking the cash component to identifiable transactions; on that basis, the tribunal found the wider additions unsustainable for assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19, while accepting only the specific differential amount supported by seized booking forms for assessment year 2019-20. Separately, unexplained expenditure under section 69C was sustained where seized material showed project-related payments and the assessee failed to produce a credible explanation or supporting evidence to reconcile the entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>