<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468625</link>
    <description>Revenue&#039;s addition for alleged bogus creditors was deleted because no substantive material was brought to dislodge the first appellate authority&#039;s factual findings, and ledger discrepancies had already been explained; the addition could not stand on limited differences alone. Depreciation on a CNC lathe was restricted to 50% because the record showed the machine was installed and used only after the relevant mid-year cutoff, with defects noticed after initial operations and no fresh evidence to show that finding was . The appellate order was therefore sustained on both issues, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468625</link>
      <description>Revenue&#039;s addition for alleged bogus creditors was deleted because no substantive material was brought to dislodge the first appellate authority&#039;s factual findings, and ledger discrepancies had already been explained; the addition could not stand on limited differences alone. Depreciation on a CNC lathe was restricted to 50% because the record showed the machine was installed and used only after the relevant mid-year cutoff, with defects noticed after initial operations and no fresh evidence to show that finding was . The appellate order was therefore sustained on both issues, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>